Wrapped crypto coins sound like gift cards, but they behave like passports in the sense that they're documents that let an asset born on one blockchain travel, trade, and occasionally misbehave on another.
When Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) launched in January 2019, it cracked open a vault of idle Bitcoin and funneled the liquidity into Ethereum's fledgling decentralized finance (DeFi) markets. Today, roughly 129,000 WBTC, worth about $15 billion, circulate on Ethereum. If that peg ever snapped, the shock would reverberate across both chains.
The momentum raises two urgent questions for investors. First, how do these synthetic stand-in tokens actually work, and what could go wrong with them? The answers mix mechanical elegance with hair-raising attack surfaces, making wrapped coins a perfect case study for crypto's progress and peril in 2025.
Why Wrap at All?
A wrapped coin is a tokenized claim on a native asset that lives somewhere else. The "wrapping" denotes that the asset in question is, at least at the time of the asset's issuance, not natively available on the blockchain where the wrapped token is.
For example, one WBTC permanently shadows one BTC locked with a custodian like BitGo, thereby letting WBTC holders deploy a Bitcoin position inside Ethereum smart contracts -- or, just to hold Bitcoin in an Ethereum wallet address for the sake of convenience. Ether itself needs a wrapper for a similar reason. The ERC-20-compliant WETH lets automated market makers (AMMs) treat ETH like any other token.
Wrappers, therefore, solve two headaches at once. They:
Allow siloed assets to cross protocol borders
Standardize them into token formats that DeFi can understand
The implications for a chain's liquidity are not a minor consideration with most wrapped tokens. WBTC supplies collateral across Aave, Curve, and dozens of smaller yield farms. A similar story plays out on layer 2 (L2) networks where WETH is the de-facto pairing asset.
Where liquidity migrates, traders and fee revenue follow, making wrapping as much a business development tool as a technical trick.
Before diving deeper, it helps to see a few more examples from the large grouping of wrapped tokens:
Even heavyweights like WBTC and WETH depend on bridge or custodian security, so pair these numbers with a healthy look at audit status, incident history, and withdrawal lags.
The lineup stretches from BitGo's SOC-2-audited cold wallets to experimental threshold schemes that promise fewer single points of failure. Diversity bolsters market depth but complicates risk management, because each approach trades one failure mode for another.
Risks and Upsides For Investors
Wrapped assets multiply Bitcoin and Ether's utility without forcing anyone to sell their core holdings.
A WBTC stack can be dropped into Aave for variable lending yield, pledged as margin on Bitfinex perpetual futures, or deposited into liquidity pools that spit out governance tokens. Rapid mint-burn cycles also create arbitrage loops that help keep DeFi prices tight relative to centralized exchanges. Generally speaking, the crypto sector as it exists today cannot function without access to wrapped tokens with deep liquidity, especially for financial workhorses like WBTC and WETH.
Here is a rapid-fire look at why many portfolio managers treat wrapped assets as everyday tools:
Instant collateral for multi-chain trading
Access to dollar-denominated yields without off-ramping or converting to stablecoins directly
Lower capital-gains friction when rotating exposures
Eligibility for governance airdrops tied to DeFi protocols
Those benefits arrive hand-in-hand with costs that rarely show up on glossy dashboards:
Mint and burn fees that widen effective bid–ask spreads
Bridge latency during network congestion spikes
Custodian downtime risk if audits, regulators, or insolvency freeze redemptions
Smart contract bugs that inflate supply
Liquidity cliffs if a wrapper's price de-pegs from the underlying asset during market stress
A sober investor, therefore, asks not only "What can I earn?" but "What can break and how fast?" DeFi history suggests the answers can change overnight.
Bridges, Custodians, and the Soft Underbelly of Security
Every wrapper must either hold the base asset in a vault or lock it behind a bridge contract.
Either way, someone likely has the keys unless the system was specifically designed without them. The public record shows those keys keep getting stolen. The Multichain router hack siphoned $130 million in 2023 by draining Fantom, Moonriver, and Dogechain liquidity. Allbridge lost $573,000 in April 2024 after an attacker manipulated its BNB-Chain pool.
Chainalysis counts $3.8 billion stolen in 2022, and Reuters says 2024 still saw $2.2 billion in losses despite beefier audits. Bridges dominate those totals because they concentrate value and cannot lean on native consensus for settlement.
Custodial models carry a different but equally existential risk.
BitGo's proof-of-reserve system looks robust, yet a single subpoena, banking freeze, or corporate failure could halt WBTC redemptions overnight. That would strand billions of wrapped Bitcoin on Ethereum and trigger fire-sale arbitrage, which would likely have severe (and difficult to predict) consequences across the entire crypto sector. Decentralized alternatives like tBTC dilute the chokepoint but still rely on younger code with thinner audits.
Practical risk management means monitoring reserve dashboards, reading incident reports, and sizing positions so a multi-day freeze cannot force liquidations. Discipline cannot erase risk, but it caps the blast radius.
The Quantum Question Hanging Over Wrapped Assets
All modern wrappers lean on elliptical-curve cryptography (ECC) for signatures, whether the keys live in BitGo's hardware modules or inside a Threshold Network smart contract.
That means they inherit one of the same slowly advancing security pressures that haunt Bitcoin itself. Google's Willow quantum chip has already shown credible progress toward breaking ECDSA, and Wired warns of an inevitable "Q-Day" when large-scale quantum hardware can devour classical signatures.
Cross-chain systems are even more exposed because they aggregate reserves behind a handful of verifier keys. If one verifier falls, an attacker could mint unlimited wrapped assets that appear legitimate until the peg collapses.
Where Does This Leave the Portfolio?
Wrapped coins now irrigate DeFi, unlock otherwise stranded capital, and give BTC holders a seat at the Ethereum table, not to mention other major blockchains like Solana, Sui, and Cardano.
Yet the mechanics that make them convenient also create extensible attack surfaces. Bridge exploits will keep eating into returns, and a late scramble into post-quantum signatures could turn a minor peg drift into a Lehman moment for DeFi.
The rational play here is a barbell. If you're so inclined, enjoy the opportunities to:
Stake WBTC for yield
Swap native ETH for WETH to optimize trades.
If you do, you'll need to demand provable reserves, layered security audits, and credible quantum roadmaps from every bridge or custodian involved. That’s especially true if you have a lot of capital to lose.
Chasing yield without doing the security diligence is just an option premium you forgot you sold, and this issue isn't going away.
To keep up with the latest in blockchain technology and quantum computing, join us on X and subscribe to our newsletter.
