Subscribe for the sharp takes on the future of Quantum Tech
Is your blockchain quantum-ready? Explore the technical findings

Is Your Blockchain Quantum-Ready?
Quantum computing risk is not tomorrow's problem anymore. With NIST's first production PQC standards now approved, the migration path is getting clearer while timelines feel tighter than before. Organizations are already being told to begin the shift to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), and that turns the concept of quantum secure cryptocurrency from a branding phrase into an implementation test.
Investors and developers need a plain-English way to compare quantum-ready blockchains, so we've compiled a reference table that does just that. Below, you'll find every major blockchain that claims to support post-quantum cryptography, along with their actual implementations, signature choices, and standardization status. This is not marketing copy—it's a technical assessment designed to help you separate the signal from the noise.
The focus here is on signature schemes because they're the most immediate quantum vulnerability for most blockchains. While other cryptographic components (like key exchange and hashing) will also need quantum-resistant upgrades, digital signatures handle transaction authorization and are where quantum attacks will likely hit first and hardest.
A Project-by-Project Comparison of Quantum-Ready Blockchains
Compare post-quantum readiness across blockchain networks
Quantus Network
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/Quantus-NetworkPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Cellframe Network
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/demlabs-cellframePost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Quantum Resistant Ledger
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/theqrlPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
XX Network
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/xxfoundationPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Abelian
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/pqabelianPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Nexus
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/NexusoftPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
QANplatform
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/QANplatformPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Mochimo
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/mochimodevPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
IOTA
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/iotaledgerPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Starknet
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/starkware-libsPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Zcash
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/zcashPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Algorand
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/algorandfoundationPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Bitcoin
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/bitcoinPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Hedera
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/hashgraphPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Ethereum
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/ethereumPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
Solana
GitHub Repository
https://github.com/solana-foundationPost-Quantum Capabilities
Signature Schemes (1)
The cards above surface the signature choice, standard, claimed NIST level, and approximate sizes that affect fees and throughput. Use this information to sanity-check roadmaps and to filter the signal from the noise.
Important Notes & Considerations
📋 NIST Standards Status
NIST has finalized two standards for signature schemes so far, with a third expected soon:
The comparison grades reflect implementation maturity, standards alignment, and documentation clarity.
📊 Size & Performance Impact
Public key and signature sizes are averages by parameter set and matter because they inflate transaction payloads. That affects fees and throughput. The NIST levels give you an apples-to-apples security yardstick to compare different signature schemes.
⚠️ Zero-Knowledge Cryptography Caveat
Important: Some systems like Zcash are marked as having "Post-Quantum ZK" capabilities, but this requires clarification.
While Zcash uses advanced zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs), the underlying cryptographic primitives still rely on elliptic curves, which are vulnerable to quantum attacks. True post-quantum ZK requires hashed-based or other quantum-resistant foundations, like the zk-STARKS used in StarkNet.
Always verify that ZK implementations use post-quantum cryptographic primitives, not just post-quantum-compatible proof systems.
🔒 The Four Critical Attack Vectors
The PQC capabilities checkboxes tell you exactly which of the four critical attack vectors each implementation addresses:
🚀 Migration Reality
A large portion of quantum disruption damage can be reduced with just secure transaction signatures. However, P2P, consensus, and ZK components are vulnerabilities that sometimes require fundamental architectural changes.
Blockchains like Bitcoin that inherited cryptographic choices from an era when quantum computers were pure science fiction have more security gaps than chains designed with quantum resistance from the beginning.
Practical Guidance for Blockchain Security Assessment
🔍 Due Diligence Checklist
📅 Standards Timeline
🚨 Red Flags to Watch
💡 Key Takeaway
The comparison above shows real implementations, not marketing promises. Focus on projects that provide specific technical details, use NIST-approved algorithms, and have clear migration timelines. Remember that quantum resistance is not binary—it's about comprehensive coverage across all cryptographic components.